Services Restorations Areas Projects Journal 0426 516 883 Free quote →

Blog

Why does a written roof scope beat a per-day crew?

A written roof scope prices a finished list: these ridges, this tile allowance, this valley, this coating. A per-day crew prices attendance. You can spend the same money and still have an open hip, because the hip was never the product. Roof Revival Melbourne sells the list. If a job cannot be written, it is not ready to be booked.

The short version

Per-day roofing survives because it sounds flexible. The crew arrives, you point, they work until the light goes, and everybody feels busy. Flexible is expensive when the target moves. Tuesday is the chimney. Wednesday is a chat about the ridge. Thursday is lost to a tip run nobody had priced. At the end of the week the roof has had visitors and the leak has had a rest. The invoice is real. The specification never was.

A scope is less romantic and easier to finish. It names the work before the ute is loaded. The crew can still think. They cannot silently swap a re-bed for a wipe-down, because the re-bed is a line you can see. The argument, if there is one, is about a line. It is not about whether a day felt productive.

What you are buying in each model

Under a day rate you are buying hours and a hope that the hours land on the failure. The incentive is to stay, or to look busy, depending on the person. Neither incentive is “finish the ridges”. A careful tradesperson on a day rate can still do good work. The contract does not require it, and the next crew on a day rate may not be that person. You are hiring a mood.

Under a scope you are buying outcomes. Bedding cut out and replaced on the named hips. Broken tiles swapped up to the allowance, with a rate beyond it. A valley replaced or explicitly left. Prep done before coating, described well enough that “prep” cannot mean a broom. Access included, so the high ridge is not abandoned when the ladder feels dodgy. The incentive is to finish the list. Finishing early is the crew’s reward, which is why the list has to be the right list. A thin scope finished quickly is still a thin job. Write the real one.

The work we are talking about is roof restoration in Melbourne. Restores are exactly where day rates go wrong, because so much of the value is ugly mechanical work. A day crew can make the roof look visited with a wash and a coat. A scope that includes the bed makes that shortcut visible.

How day-rate weeks expand

The pattern is familiar in Melbourne. The first day is an honest start. The second day finds more cracked tiles than anyone mentioned. Without an allowance or a rate, the conversation becomes a negotiation on the roof, in the wind, with you at work. The third day is “we’ll need another day”. The fourth day is a coating, because coating looks like progress and bedding looks like rubble. You have paid for four days. You have bought the job the crew preferred, not the job the roof needed.

Variations are allowed inside a scope. They are a photo, a line, and a price, agreed before the extra work. That is slower by an hour and faster by a week. The day-rate version of a variation is a shrug and another sunrise. Keep the shrug out of the contract.

Weather makes this sharper. A day rate on a wet week is a debate about whether a rained-off morning still counts. A scope does not charge you for Thursdays that did not happen. It charges you for ridges that did. If the crew needs a clear day to coat, they wait, and the price of the coating line does not grow because the calendar did.

The cowboy version has a script

The script is confidence. “We’ll be there Monday, we’ll see how we go, don’t worry about a novel.” The script dislikes photos, because photos pin the starting point. The script dislikes exclusions, because exclusions are decisions. The script likes cash, a first name, and a promise that writing it down is for people who don’t trust anyone. Trust is a fine thing to feel after the scope exists. It is a poor substitute for the hip being listed.

There is a softer version that is still a problem. A pleasant crew, a fair hourly feeling, and no malice. The roof is large. The days leak away in trips for mortar, in a broken ladder, in a long lunch. You are funding the disorganisation. A scoped job puts that cost inside the company’s price, where it belongs. If we misjudge the hours, that is our problem, provided the list was honest. If the list was dishonestly thin, that is a different sin, and the photos catch it.

Compare this with the gaps inside cheap quotes. A day rate and a gappy fixed price fail in opposite costumes. One never names the work. The other names a smaller job than the roof. The fix is the same reading: what, exactly, will be different on Friday.

When time-based work is still the right tool

A short investigation can be time-based. “Two hours on the roof, photos, and a written recommendation” is a clean product. You are buying the inspection, and the end is a document. Making-good after another trade, where nobody knows the extent until the lining comes down, can be time-based with a cap and a check-in. The rule is that the product is still described. Hours are the meter, not the mystery.

A whole restore, a re-bed, or a re-roof should leave that meter behind. Squares can be measured. Ridges can be measured. Access can be seen. If a company says the roof is too unpredictable to scope, ask what they are afraid of finding. Then put an allowance on that thing. Unpredictable is usually one or two lines, not the entire contract.

How to convert a day-rate offer into a decision

Ask them to rewrite it. Same people, same roof, as a list. If they can, you may have found a good crew with a bad habit, and the rewrite is the quote. If they will not, or if the rewrite is “restore as required”, you have your answer. As required is the day rate in a fixed-price hat.

Then compare that list with a scoped quote, not with the day-rate total. Five days at a round number can look cheaper than a restore until you notice the five days never mentioned repointing. Price the missing lines at a realistic rate and add them. The “dearer” scope is often the smaller final spend, because it includes the second visit the day rate was going to discover later.

Roof Revival Melbourne will write the list or we will tell you the roof does not need us. We will not fill a week to see how we go.

From a vague week to a list

  1. 1. Inspect and photograph the failures
  2. 2. Name ridges, tiles, valleys, prep, and coating
  3. 3. Put a rate on the likely variation
  4. 4. Price the list, not the attendance
  5. 5. Finish the list and photograph it again

Related pages

Questions

Yes. The contract is still the weak part. A day rate buys hours. If you want named ridges and a finished coating system, ask for that list and a price for the list.
A fixed price for a complete list is safer. A fixed price for “restore as required” is a day rate without the honesty. Read the lines.
That is a variation: a photo, a count, and the rate you agreed. It is not an automatic extra day. The allowance should already be in the scope.
Because the missing work is still in the roof, unpaid, waiting. Add the ridges and the tiles back in before you decide which quote is actually lower.

Next step

Send suburb, storeys and two roof photos. Roof Revival Melbourne — 0426 516 883 · info@roofrevivalmelbourne.com.au

Contact